Don’t Help me, Trust me – Your African Coffee Producer

18 Apr

By Tanja Goodwin

At a recent speech at DRI, Andrew Rugasira described what happened as Good African Coffee, the business he founded in Uganda’s Rwenzori mountains, began to take off. As farmers began to produce higher quality coffee and see higher prices for their crops:

Something really extraordinary began to happen.  The values that we don’t really hear about in a lot of these development reports began to manifest: entrepreneurship, business exposure, dignity, esteem, the pride in producing a product that they knew was going into a market…

 Find Andrew’s full speech and other video from DRI’s conference here

While the role of beliefs and values as catalysts for economic growth may still be “underrated and underdebated,” development economists have recently begun taking a closer look.  As a new working paper by Chris Coyne and Claudia Williamson explains, higher levels of self-determination, mutual respect and trust allow impersonal market transactions to happen efficiently, and more market transactions improve economic specialization and productivity.

Since every pound of African coffee we buy in the US relies upon dozens of formal and informal contracts between farmers, packagers, exporters and retailers, the “culture of contracting” matters. And contracts rely on interpersonal trust between strangers each pursuing his or her own self-interest.

Trade sets off a positive feedback loop: In Uganda, the more local producers sell their coffee to strangers, the more they will trust new buyers. The more buyers receive good quality the more they will trust, and look for, coffee from Uganda. Trade induces more trade.

But does aid induce more trade? For Coyne and Williamson, aid flows tend to create dependency and weaken the incentives for people to engage in business and trade, economic activities that rely upon contracts. Where aid triggers rent-seeking activities like corruption or fraud, it is also likely to reduce trust among strangers.

Countries that receive more aid for every dollar of goods they trade score lower on average on the index for culture of contracting, even controlling for reverse causality. The index combines answers to survey questions on trust, respect, individual self-determination, and obedience.

Coyne and Williamson find empirical evidence that trade and aid affect values in opposite ways. This implies it’s the business relationships—not the handouts—that help African farmers in the long run. Yet for Rugasira, getting investors and retailers to look beyond Uganda’s image as war-torn playground of Idi Amin or Joseph Kony has been incredibly difficult. He concluded, “If we treat [African people] like entrepreneurs, people with dignity and self-respect…we might find that we have a different set of results.”

Tags: , , , ,

Why not delay the vote for World Bank President?

13 Apr

Why Bill Easterly believes that all candidates for World Bank President should be given more time to engage in a public debate:

A public forum allows many different minority viewpoints to be heard. Indeed, the backlash against Kim has generated its own backlash. The point of a forum is not to privilege Kim’s critics but to let both sides speak. Debates between opposite viewpoints are crucial to any democratic process, preventing “groupthink”; even when the dissidents are wrong, they force those with the right view to make their case. The CGD/Washington Post forum was transparent (the sessions with Okonjo-Iweala and Ocampo were both live-streamed and posted afterwards on the internet). Kim’s discussions with global leaders were not transparent.

Imagine a nominee with controversial environmental views or credentials were in the frame to lead America’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It’s unlikely the administration would say the nominee was so busy meeting members of Congress behind closed doors that he or she had no time to consult with environmentalists.

Read the entire piece, published this afternoon, in The Guardian.

Tags: , , ,

False Dichotomies: National vs Humane Development

13 Apr

By Gregg Gonsalves

Lant Pritchett—a Professor of the Practice of International Development at the Harvard Kennedy School—has been leading a campaign against the election of Jim Kim to the World Bank presidency.   While he isn’t the only critic of Dr. Kim’s nomination, he is among the most vocal, prominent and well known.   Though his views are his own, many of them have been amplified and echoed by other leading development economists like William Easterly at New York University and several people associated with the Center for Global Development in Washington, DC.

Over the past few weeks, Pritchett has questioned Kim’s qualifications, saying a lack of training in economics and experience in world finance should disqualify him from consideration for the post. He has further suggested that the nomination is about the arrogance of American power and hegemony over the institution and that he should step aside for a merit-based election in which the Nigerian candidate for the post, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, a World Bank, Harvard and MIT alum and finance minister of Nigeria would sweep to victory. Continue reading 

Tags: , , ,

The Other Gentlemen’s Agreement

12 Apr
 
Who gets a vote? 25 Executive Directors on the Executive Board of the World Bank, each appointed by member governments 117 Cardinals, each appointed by the Pope, forming the College of Cardinals
Where are they from? 56% from North America and Europe 62% from North America and Europe
Who does NOT get to vote? 1.3 billion poor people 1.2 billion Catholics
Who is chosen? A gentleman from the US, 100% of the time since 1946 AD A gentleman from Europe, 100% of the time since 741 AD
What is the voting system? The US, Japan, Germany, France, the UK, Russia, Saudi Arabia and China appoint one Executive Director each. The US ED has 15.5% of the voting power, Japan has 9%, and everyone else has less than 5%. The other 17 EDs are elected by groups of countries. For example, Poland, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan and others select a Swiss ED:

Click to enlarge

Each cardinal under age 80 has 1 vote. In 2005, Europe was represented with 50% of the cardinals and North America with 12%. 18% of the Cardinals were of Latin American origin, 9% African and 9% Asian. The composition of the College changes as the new Pope appoints new cardinals.

Click to enlarge

How is the vote legitimized? “The Executive Directors […] shall exercise all the powers delegated to them by the Board of Governors” “quasi afflati Spiritu Sancto” (as if inspired by the Holy Ghost)
What is the final voting tally? 100% in favor of winning candidate* 100% in favor of winning candidate
How did the representatives actually vote? Only God knows

On April 16, expect white smoke to rise out of H Street and 19th.

*UPDATE April 16, 2012: The new World Bank President was announced today and the American nominee, Jim Yong Kim, was elected. For the first time in World Bank history, the vote was not unanimous, but the voting tally has so far not been made public.

Tags: ,

The Roots of Hardship

9 Apr

Bill Easterly reviewed “Why Nations Fail” by Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson for the Wall Street Journal:

Far too much intellectual firepower regarding the global poor these days focuses on the (small) things Westerners can do to help—obsessing about, say, how much money to spend on mosquito-blocking bed nets to fight malaria. The bigger questions—about why some societies prosper and others don’t, about how to improve the lot of an entire impoverished class—are left by default largely to uncritical admirers of China’s growth. The arrival of “Why Nations Fail” is thus a hugely welcome event, since economists Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson take on the big questions and in doing so present a substantial alternative to the dominant thinking about global poverty. Continue reading 

Tags: , , ,

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 9,041 other followers