Global Redistricting: How Energy Pipelines Are Re-Drawing the World’s Divides

Mark Kennedy

September 3, 2025

The Strategic Stakes of Power of Siberia

A large metal pipeline runs through a grassy area surrounded by dense evergreen trees, with a misty forest background.

In American politics, few practices are as divisive as redistricting. Every ten years, congressional lines are redrawn, often to entrench one party’s advantage. The process is currently reshaping battlegrounds across the nation: Texas and California are under scrutiny for how their new maps affect representation, Missouripolitics are being jolted by redistricting push, and in Indiana, is considering a new map that could dramatically alter districts. The effect is predictable: safe seats, hardened factions, and fewer incentives to compromise. The result is a more polarized politics.

A similar kind of redistricting is happening on the world stage. But instead of congressional districts, it is energy flows being redrawn. And instead of partisan divides, it is geopolitical blocs that are hardening.

Just following last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit, Russia and China inked a deal on the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline — a project that would channel Siberian gas to northern China by the early 2030s. Gazprom signed a legally binding agreement to deliver as much as 50 billion cubic meters annually for 30 years, at a price lower than what Europe once paid. CEO Alexey Miller boasted that “this is going to become the largest, the most massive and capital-intensive gas project in the world.”

For Russia, Power of Siberia 2 is a lifeline. Once the dominant supplier of natural gas to Europe, Moscow has seen its western market collapse under the weight of sanctions and self-inflicted mistrust. By turning east, Russia signals that its energy future lies in China, not Berlin or Brussels. This deepens Moscow’s dependenceon Beijing — a reversal of decades in which Russia was the stronger partner.

For China, the pipeline strengthens energy security. Roughly 40 percent of China’s gas imports currently arrive as liquefied natural gas (LNG) carried on tankers from the U.S., Qatar, and Australia. In a crisis, those sea lanes could be vulnerable to disruption. Pipelines from Russia, by contrast, are sanction-resistant and blockade-proof. With Power of Siberia 2, Beijing reduces its exposure to maritime chokepoints and gains leverage over global LNG suppliers.

For Western exporters, the picture shifts as well. With China relying more on Russian pipelines, LNG from Australia and Qatar will flow elsewhere — particularly to Europe, which since 2022 has been scrambling to replace lost Russian supply. With China turning to Russian pipeline gas, U.S. LNG companies may face fewer opportunities to expand in Asia, leaving them to focus more heavily on supplying Europe.

Geopolitical Implications: Realigning Energy Alliances

The knock-on effects extend far beyond trade. They represent a structural realignment of global energy alliances:

  • Closer Western Alignment with LNG Giants: Australia and Qatar, once balancing between Asian and European buyers, will be drawn more tightly into U.S.-aligned energy frameworks as China closes itself off with Russia. This creates the possibility of an informal “trusted LNG club” of the U.S., Australia, and Qatar supplying Europe and Asia’s democracies.
  • Strategic Messaging to the Global South: As Russia and China deepen their pipeline pact, Washington can highlight its partnerships with Australia and Qatar as proof that its supply chains are more reliable, transparent, and responsive than authoritarian alternatives.
  • Reduced Leverage for Moscow and Beijing: By absorbing Australian and Qatari gas into allied networks, the West not only secures its own energy resilience but also limits the options available to China if relations with Russia sour — leaving Beijing more dependent on Moscow’s terms.
  • Integration with Broader Security Architecture: For Australia, already a key partner in AUKUS and the Quad, playing a central role in LNG supply reinforces its Indo-Pacific leadership. For Qatar, whose careful balancing act has included ties to China and Russia, redirecting cargoes westward would bind it more firmly to U.S. and European security frameworks.

This is global redistricting in action. Just as partisan map-drawing at home entrenches divides and reduces the space for negotiation, new infrastructure abroad is hardening blocs and limiting flexibility. Once the steel is in the ground, the flows it carries are difficult to reroute.

Policymakers in Washington should not dismiss the Power of Siberia 2 announcement as merely a commercial deal awaiting final terms. It is a strategic play. It ties Russia’s economic future more tightly to China’s rise. It helps Beijing hedge against Western leverage. And it signals to the Global South that non-Western institutions and alliances — from the SCO to yuan-denominated development banks — are gaining momentum.

What Should the U.S. and Allies Do?

1. Recognize the permanence of the shift. Just as Europe is unlikely ever again to be Russia’s primary gas customer, Russia is unlikely to loosen its embrace of China. Strategy must start from this new baseline.

2. Double down on trusted energy partnerships. U.S. LNG exports have become a cornerstone of Europe’s resilience. Ensuring infrastructure, financing, and permitting keep pace is essential. Washington should also work with Australia and Qatar to redirect supplies to allied markets and reinforce democratic supply chains.

3. Treat infrastructure as strategy. The Belt and Road Initiative, the new SCO Development Bank, and now Power of Siberia 2 all show that China and its partners view physical and financial connectivity as tools of power. The U.S. needs its own playbook. That means supporting the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII), mobilizing private capital, and working with allies to offer alternatives.

4. Speak plainly about the stakes. Energy is not just about kilowatt-hours or cubic meters. It is about which lines on the global map will bind us together — and which will divide us.

In domestic politics, redistricting is fought over because it shapes power for a decade. In geopolitics, global redistricting may shape power for a generation. The Power of Siberia 2 is not just a pipeline. It is a line on the map of a more divided world.

 


In line with my belief that responsibly embracing AI is essential to both personal and national success, this piece was developed with the support of AI tools, though all arguments and conclusions are my own.

Author

Mark Kennedy

WISC Director, DRI Senior Fellow